| |
|
|
23-11-2011
|
5.000+ nye emails fra UEA/CRU
Climategate 2.0 - Climateaudit
Climategate 2.0 - Watts |
|
15-11-2011
|
Russian Scientist Predicts The Next Grand Minimum
|
|
18-07-2011
|
Rural Unadjusted Temperature Index - Historiske temperaturer i Skandivanien
|
|
31-10-2010 |
New peer reviewed paper says “there appear to have been periods of ice free summers in the central Arctic Ocean” in the early Holocene, about 10-11,000 years ago
"The combined sea ice data suggest that the seasonal Arctic sea ice cover was strongly reduced during most of the early Holocene and there appear to have been periods of ice free summers in the central Arctic Ocean. This has important consequences for our understanding of the recent trend of declining sea ice, and calls for further research on causal links between Arctic climate and sea ice." |
|
16-09-2010 |
Scientist: There is no observational evidence for influence of CO2 on present or
past climate
"Dr. Ir. Noor van Andel, former head of research at Akzo Nobel, recently
presented a talk at the Dutch Meteorological Institute KNMI, concluding there is
• No observational evidence for influence of CO2 on past or present climate" |
|
16-09-2010 |
Understanding the Climategate Inquiries By Ross McKitrick, Ph.D
"The scientists took steps individually or in collusion to block access to data
or methodologies in order to prevent external examination of their work. This
point was accepted by the Commons Inquiry and Muir Russell, and the authors were
admonished and encouraged to improve their conduct in the future." |
|
04-09-2010 |
Unadjusted temperature series
link
"
Although the original data was chosen for its cooling trend this, in many cases, results from warmer temperatures in the period 1930-1940 than present.
The wave pattern is still present in many data sets worldwide, no matter what the overall trend. In some the date of the onset of warming or cooling is later or earlier, depending on location – as would be expected with the oceans moving warmth around the globe. In others however the wave pattern is not present or is obliterated by something – in these sets should it be present or not? Is it wiped out by anthropogenic effects on the temperature record such as growth of cities and even small rural communities though the otherwise cooling 40s, 50s and 60s?
"
|
|
15-08-2010 |
Sea levels in South Pacific
link
"
By looking closely at the records, it turns out that the much advertised rising sea levels in the South Pacific depend on anomalous depressions of the ocean during 1997 and 1998 thanks to an El Nino and two tropical cyclones. The Science and Public Policy Institute has released a report by Vincent Gray which compares 12 Pacific Island records and shows that in many cases it’s these anomalies that set the trends… and if the anomaly is removed, sea levels appear to be more or less constant since the Seaframe measurements began around 1993.
"
|
|
15-08-2010 |
Christy bedømmer klima modeller anno 1988
link
"
The result suggests the old NASA GCM was considerably more sensitive to GHGs than is the real atmosphere since (a) the model was forced with lower GHG concentrations than actually occurred and (b) still gave a result that was significantly warmer than observations.
"
|
|
23-07-2010 |
Ny gennemgang af GISS og deres ændrede vægtning af land- og sea-målinger
Ser ud til at vægtningen er ændret i løbet af 1900-tallet, således at den overstiger den naturlige 30/70 fordeling.
link
"
Whats the impact of the still greater land fraction in GISS global total LST+SST data?
If the 30% land fraction from the real world was used, GISS global 2007 would be 0,55K warmer than GISS global 1900.
With the still increasing GISS land fraction actually used, we have GISS global 2007 0,72K warmer than GISS global 1900.
The difference is 0,17K added by increasing land fraction over the 20´ieth century in stead of using 30% land constantly.
But this calculation could be done in many ways.
We know for a fact that the oceans cover 70% of the planet. So why not use 70% of data from SST?
"
|
|
26-05-2010 |
Steve McIntyre indlæg fra
Chicago klima konference der gennemgår historien om
ClimateGate email sagen fra 1997 og frem.
PDF
Video
"The critical scientific issue – as it has been for the
past 30 years – is climate sensitivity and whether cloud
and water cycle feedbacks are strongly positive or
weakly negative or somewhere in between.
This is territory of Lindzen, Spencer, Kininmonth and
Paltridge. But persuasive as they may be, keep an open
mind because many serious scientists do not agree with
them and stand behind standard estimates of climate
sensitivity to doubled CO2 in good faith.
If the impact of doubled CO2 is relatively small, it
would be through sheer good luck rather than through
good management. I do not subscribe to the belief that
we need perfect certainty to make decisions – on the
contrary, businessmen and politicians make decisions all
the time under
unquantifiable uncertainty and I, for one, have no
philosophical objection to governments making decisions
on climate policy. I think that there may be important
practical situations where people who are primarily
worried about the energy future can find common ground
with
people who are primarily worried about climate.
If I were a minister of the environment with policy
responsibilities, regardless of what I felt personally,
I would take scientific guidance from official
institutions, rather than what I might think personally
either as an occasional contributor to academic journals
or as a blogger. Though,
knowing what I know now, I would also try to improve the
performance and accountability of
these institutions.
People sometimes say to me – if the hockey stick is
wrong, then the situation is worse than we think –
arguing this on the basis that this would be evidence of
greater climate sensitivity. My standard answer is –
well, if that’s the case, we should find out and govern
ourselves accordingly.
And give no thanks to people whose obstruction has
delayed the resolution of the problem.
Og glem ikke John Stewart (Daily
Show)
video om Climategate :-) |
|
18-05-2010 |
Der er klima konference med bla.
Patrick Michaels
Klik her for Lindzen præsenattion:
pdf |
|
23-03-2010 |
GISS data er åbenbart blevet efter
justeret med tilbagevirkende kraft:
Læs mere:
HideTheDecline
Icecap
JoNova
|
|
14-03-2010 |
Chris Horner med
video kommentar til NASA temperatur dataset mm.
|
|
11-03-2010 |
Link til
skeptiker håndbog. Dansk oversættelse af artikel
fra
Jo Nova website . link mm
(Jo Nova som i bogen skriver at hun troede på AGW
1990-2007 !! ) |
|
07-03-2010 |
Ugens graf, klimaet de
sidste 10.000 år iflg. iskerner (Grønland):
artikel
 |
|
23-02-2010 |
Michael Crichton's tale om Videnskabens
udvikling de sidste 30 år
|
|
15-02-2010 |
Scandinavian temperatures, IPCC´s "Scandinavia-gate"
 |
|
15-02-2010 |
Ny side inspireret af CRU
Climate-Gate,
HideTheDecline
 |
|
24-01-2010 |
Bill Gates med en note
omkring hvad 80% CO2 reduktion virkelig betyder:
Gates |
|
24-01-2010 |
IPCC og deres fejl mht.
gletchere i Himalaya
telegraph
"More mistakes about Himalayan glaciers seem to have
been uncovered in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change’s (IPCC) latest report, further threatening its
credibility and undermining the position of its chairman,
Dr Rajendra Pachauri." |
|
13-01-2010 |
Spencer: Clouds Dominate CO2 as a Climate Driver Since
2000
"Any way you look at it, the evidence for
internally-forced climate change is pretty clear. Based
upon this satellite evidence alone, I do not see how the
IPCC can continue to ignore internally-forced variations
in the climate system. The evidence for its existence is
there for all to see, and in my opinion, the IPCC’s lack
of diagnostic skill in this matter verges on scientific
malpractice."
|
|
03-01-2010 |
Landscheidt info
:
Landscheidt
Cycles Research
"Back in 1965 Paul Jose
was one of the first to link solar modulation with
planetary movements. He discovered that the planets
roughly returned to the same position every 178.8 years
(My research suggests 172 yrs). Jose's paper included a
very rough solar radius graph which showed some
modulation but was difficult to draw from. Later Theodor
Landscheidt wrote many papers using a similar principle
but mainly relied on solar torque graphs which ranged
over long time periods, this made it difficult to
predict a solar grand minimum except in a rough time
frame. Landscheidt predicted a Grand Minimum to occur
around 2030 which might be late, if the current trend
continues.
Then Carl Smith in 2007 using JPL data and his own
programming skills plotted the Angular Momentum of the
Sun. This graph I believe is the Rosetta stone of solar
science."
Earth's
Future Climate.
 |
|
28-12-2009 |
The Unbearable Complexity
of Climate (Willis Eschenbach)
 |
